# Entity Exposure Index Updated: 2026-08-20T07:53:19.999Z ## Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York Score: 552 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Score: 184 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Score: 184 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## District Court of Appeal of Florida Score: 184 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: District Court of Appeal of Florida deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 2024-03048 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 2024-03048 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 2024-03321 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 2024-03321 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 2025-04559 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 2025-04559 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 23-461 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 23-461 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 24-60240 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 24-60240 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 2D2026-0154 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 2D2026-0154 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Bergam v. Dinerman Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Bergam v. Dinerman deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## K Alain v. CIR Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: K Alain v. CIR deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Kinzler v. Ascend Learning, Inc. Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Kinzler v. Ascend Learning, Inc. deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## McLari Logistics, Inc., McLari v. Berding Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: McLari Logistics, Inc., McLari v. Berding deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## People v. Lee Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: People v. Lee deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Reyes v. Paul Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Reyes v. Paul deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Score: 134 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Health and Human Services Department Score: 134 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Health and Human Services Department deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Homeland Security Department Score: 78 Level: high public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Homeland Security Department deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## AAPL Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: AAPL deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Alphabet Inc. Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Alphabet Inc. deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## AMAZON COM INC Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: AMAZON COM INC deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## AMZN Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: AMZN deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Apple Inc. Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Apple Inc. deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## AVGO Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: AVGO deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Broadcom Inc. Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Broadcom Inc. deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## GOOGL Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: GOOGL deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## MICROSOFT CORP Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: MICROSOFT CORP deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## MSFT Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: MSFT deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## NVDA Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: NVDA deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## NVIDIA CORP Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: NVIDIA CORP deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Regulatory Information Service Center Score: 40 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Regulatory Information Service Center deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Securities and Exchange Commission Score: 40 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Securities and Exchange Commission deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing.